Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs 4250 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 4250 IGP vs the 4250. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 594 MHz | vs | 498 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs 4250
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 4250 IGP | vs | 4250 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | ATi | ATI | |
| GPU name | RS880 | RV620 | |
| Clock speed | 498 MHz | 594 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None |
raw performance | Radeon HD 4250 IGP | vs | 4250 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 40 | 40 | |
| Texture mapping units | 4 | 4 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
| Compute units | 2 | 2 | |
| Pixel rate | 1.99 GPixel/s | 2.38 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 1.99 GTexel/s | 2.38 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 39.84 GFLOPS | 47.52 GFLOPS |
