Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4850 X2

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 4850 X2

Report a correction
Significantly more shading units 1,600 vs 480 1120 more shading units
Better floating-point performance 2,000 GFLOPS vs 1,192.4 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Lower TDP 250W vs 289W Around 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 295

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 295

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 223.8 GB/s vs 127.36 GB/s More than 75% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 160 vs 80 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 56 vs 32 24 more render output processors
More memory 1,792 MB vs 1,024 MB 75% more memory
Higher texture rate 92.16 GTexel/s vs 50 GTexel/s Around 85% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 32.26 GPixel/s vs 20 GPixel/s More than 60% higher pixel rate
Wider memory bus 896 bit vs 512 bit 75% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 4850 X2 vs GeForce GTX 295

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more


comments powered by Disqus