Winner
ATi Radeon HD 4850
GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 4850 based on its noise and power.
See full details Radeon HD 4850 vs GeForce GTS 250 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4850 vs GTS 250 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 128 | 672 more shading units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,000 GFLOPS | vs | 483.8 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Lower TDP | 110W | vs | 150W | More than 25% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 750 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | 25 GTexel/s | More than 90% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 2,300 MHz | vs | 1,986 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 49 | vs | 40 | Around 25% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 993 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
