Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4860

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon HD 4860

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 14.37 GB/s Around 6.8x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,000 MHz vs 1,796 MHz More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed
Much better cloud gate factor score 12.93 vs 5.08 More than 2.5x better cloud gate factor score
Better floating-point performance 896 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS More than 5.8x better floating-point performance
More shading units 640 vs 48 592 more shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 2 14 more render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 64 bit 4x wider memory bus
Higher pixel rate 11.2 GPixel/s vs 1.62 GPixel/s Around 7x higher pixel rate
Slightly higher texture rate 22.4 GTexel/s vs 6.48 GTexel/s Around 3.5x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GT 520

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 520

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory clock speed 898 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 29W vs 130W 4.5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 4860 vs GeForce GT 520

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 4860
3,355.58
GeForce GT 520
1,559.39

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus