Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 4890

Reasons to consider the
XFX Radeon HD 4890

Report a correction
More shading units 800 vs 384 416 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 3,538 vs 1,535 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Much better sky diver factor score 227.23 vs 2.27 Around 100.2x better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher texture rate 60.8 GTexel/s vs 40 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Lower TDP 170W vs 190W More than 10% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 4890  vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

8.7
9.2
Considering the excellent cooling capabilities of the heatsink I see no reason why they didn't clock higher.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comments

comments powered by Disqus