Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5450

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5450

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 250 MHz More than 2.5x higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 800 MHz vs 400 MHz 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 400 MHz vs 200 MHz 2x higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile vs the ATi Radeon HD 5450.

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 5450  vs GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile 

effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 5450  vs
GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile 
GPU brand ATI Nvidia
GPU name Cedar NV34
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 650 MHz 250 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Texture mapping units 8 4
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 2.6 GPixel/s 1 GPixel/s
Texture rate 5.2 GTexel/s 1 GTexel/s


Radeon HD 5450  vs
GeForce FX 5200 Low Profile 
Memory clock speed 400 MHz 200 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz
Memory bus 64 bit 64 bit
Memory 512 MB 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 6.4 GB/s 3.2 GB/s


comments powered by Disqus