Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5450

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5450

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 344 MHz Around 90% higher clock speed
Front view of Radeon 3000 IGP

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon 3000 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Radeon 3000 IGP vs the Radeon HD 5450.

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 5450  vs 3000 IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 5450
2.6 GPixel/s
Radeon 3000 IGP
1.38 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 5450
5.2 GTexel/s
Radeon 3000 IGP
1.38 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 5450
Radeon 3000 IGP
27.52 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 5450  vs
3000 IGP 
GPU brand ATI ATi
GPU name Cedar RS780L
Clock speed 650 MHz 344 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

raw performance

Radeon HD 5450  vs
3000 IGP 
Shading units 80 40
Texture mapping units 8 4
Render output processors 4 4
Compute units 2 2
Pixel rate 2.6 GPixel/s 1.38 GPixel/s
Texture rate 5.2 GTexel/s 1.38 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 104 GFLOPS 27.52 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus