GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 Engineering Sample vs 670 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Report a correction
Lower TDP 108W vs 170W More than 35% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 670

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,610 vs 9,992 Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,150 vs 17,844 Around 65% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,374 vs 1,697 Around 3.2x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,600 vs 2,410 Around 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 109.4 fps vs 29.3 fps Around 3.8x higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 4,800 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 34 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 1,360 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
Significantly better cloud gate factor score 20.91 vs 14.6 Around 45% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 40 72 more texture mapping units
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Slightly higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 13.6 GPixel/s Around 90% higher pixel rate
Better video composition score 69.27 frames/s vs 28.54 frames/s Around 2.5x better video composition score
More shading units 1,344 vs 800 544 more shading units
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,578 vs 805 Around 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher crysis 3 framerate 55 vs 40 Around 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
Better manhattan score 3,710.86 vs 3,507.76 More than 5% better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 670

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
42.55 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 670
1,143.56 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus