GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 Engineering Sample vs 770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 108W vs 230W 2.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 9,992 More than 3.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better PassMark score 6,099 vs 1,697 More than 3.5x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 17,844 More than 65% better 3DMark06 score
Much higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Around 3x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 2,410 Around 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 4,800 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 29.3 fps More than 4.2x higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 34 GTexel/s Around 4x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,360 GFLOPS More than 2.2x better floating-point performance
Much better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 140.24 Around 2.8x better sky diver factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 40 88 more texture mapping units
Much better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 461.22 frames/s More than 3.5x better ocean surface simulation score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 13.6 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 40 More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
More shading units 1,536 vs 800 736 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 805 More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus