GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 Engineering Sample vs 960 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 17,844 vs 10,767.5 More than 65% better 3DMark06 score
Front view of GeForce GTX 960

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 32,987 vs 2,410 Around 13.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 5,813 vs 1,697 Around 3.5x better PassMark score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 32,171 vs 9,992 Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,127 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 4,800 MHz More than 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 112.2 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s More than 45% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 36.1 GPixel/s vs 13.6 GPixel/s Around 2.8x higher pixel rate
Better floating-point performance 2,308.1 GFLOPS vs 1,360 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly better cloud gate factor score 20.16 vs 14.6 Around 40% better cloud gate factor score
Higher texture rate 72.1 GTexel/s vs 34 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 45% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Better T-Rex score 3.92 frames/s vs 1.05 frames/s Around 3.8x better T-Rex score
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,046 vs 805 More than 3.8x better PassMark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
More shading units 1,024 vs 800 224 more shading units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample vs GeForce GTX 960

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
111.95 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
69.13 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 960
780.9 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770 Engineering Sample
207.34 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960
710.39 mInteraction/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus