Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 1030 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GT 1030 |
Released October, 2009
ATi Radeon HD 5770
- 850 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Feb, 2010)Actually the cooler is considerably quieter than AMD's HD 5770 reference cooler, but still audible.
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 vs 1030 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 1030GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | vs | 48.06 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 384 | 416 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,227 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 4,800 MHz | More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 27.03 | vs | 19.74 | More than 35% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better manhattan score | 3,707.62 | vs | 3,420.23 | Around 10% better manhattan score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.42 frames/s | vs | 1.05 frames/s | More than 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,617 | vs | 805 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 30W | vs | 108W | 3.6x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
