GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 vs 435M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.1

Overall Score

Winner
ATi Radeon HD 5770 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 5770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

ATi Radeon HD 5770

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 17,844 vs 799 More than 22.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,800 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 850 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 9,992 vs 3,112 Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 1,697 vs 661 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 3x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,360 GFLOPS vs 249.6 GFLOPS Around 5.5x better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 13.6 GPixel/s vs 2.6 GPixel/s Around 5.2x higher pixel rate
More shading units 800 vs 96 704 more shading units
Better sky diver factor score 140.24 vs 68.85 More than 2x better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 800 MHz 50% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher texture rate 34 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel/s More than 3.2x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 40 vs 16 24 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 805 vs 301 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GT 435M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 435M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 7,510.5 vs 2,410 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 35W vs 108W 3.1x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GT 435M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
9.96 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 435M
4.25 mPixels/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Comments

comments powered by Disqus