GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 vs 260 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
ATi Radeon HD 5770 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 5770  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 4,800 MHz vs 2,016 MHz Around 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 850 MHz vs 518 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,360 GFLOPS vs 414.7 GFLOPS More than 3.2x better floating-point performance
More shading units 800 vs 192 608 more shading units
Better particle simulation score 207.34 mInteraction/s vs 26.34 mInteraction/s More than 7.8x better particle simulation score
Better cloud gate factor score 14.6 vs 13.11 More than 10% better cloud gate factor score
Higher memory clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 1,008 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 108W vs 182W More than 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 260

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 112.9 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s More than 45% higher memory bandwidth
Much wider memory bus 448 bit vs 128 bit 3.5x wider memory bus
Slightly more memory 1,792 MB vs 1,024 MB 75% more memory
More render output processors 28 vs 16 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GTX 260

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
122.81 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 260
29.52 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
9.96 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 260
8.66 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
461.22 frames/s
GeForce GTX 260
477.33 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
207.34 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 260
26.34 mInteraction/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
28.54 frames/s
GeForce GTX 260
24.91 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
3,353.2
GeForce GTX 260
3,355.14

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 5770  vs GeForce GTX 260 

9.0
9.2
NVIDIA's HDMI Audio design requires you to feed an audio signal to the card so it can be added to the HDMI Video stream from the card.
GeForce GTX 260

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus