Winner
EVGA GeForce GTX 570
GPUBoss recommends the EVGA GeForce GTX 570 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GTX 570 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 vs 570 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | EVGA GeForce GTX 570GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,800 MHz | vs | 3,900 MHz | Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More shading units | 800 | vs | 480 | 320 more shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 975 MHz | Around 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 108W | vs | 219W | 2x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 4,412 | vs | 1,697 | More than 2.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 20,620 | vs | 9,992 | More than 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 65.2 fps | vs | 29.3 fps | Around 2.2x higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 156 GB/s | vs | 76.8 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 21,006.5 | vs | 17,844 | Around 20% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 5,033 | vs | 2,410 | More than 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 40 | vs | 16 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 38.44 | vs | 19.74 | Around 95% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 320 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2.5x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 23.91 GPixel/s | vs | 13.6 GPixel/s | More than 75% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better face detection score | 36.96 mPixels/s | vs | 9.96 mPixels/s | Around 3.8x better face detection score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 60 | vs | 40 | 20 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,653 | vs | 805 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
