GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 5770 vs 950 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950  based on its compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 17,844 vs 8,351 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 40 vs 29 Around 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 5,206 vs 1,697 More than 3x better PassMark score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 4,800 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,024 MHz vs 850 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 105.8 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 13.6 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly better fire strike factor score 44.05 vs 19.74 Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 1,200 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Better bitcoin mining score 233.75 mHash/s vs 71.85 mHash/s More than 3.2x better bitcoin mining score
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 2,495 vs 805 More than 3x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly higher texture rate 49.2 GTexel/s vs 34 GTexel/s Around 45% higher texture rate
Slightly better manhattan score 3,712.8 vs 3,539.34 Around 5% better manhattan score
Lower TDP 90W vs 108W More than 15% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 5770 vs GeForce GTX 950

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
71.85 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 950
233.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
9.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950
60.21 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
461.23 frames/s
GeForce GTX 950
1,001.72 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
3,359.74
GeForce GTX 950
3,355.38

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
3,539.34
GeForce GTX 950
3,712.8

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 5770  vs GeForce GTX 950 

9.0
8.3
We saw good overclocking results on our sample, which didn't break any sweat at all when overclocked.
Radeon HD 5770

Comments

comments powered by Disqus