Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details| | Radeon HD 5870 vs GeForce GTX 670 |
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2010)Desktop157 MHz300 MHz0.95 VBlu-Ray Playback400 MHz900 MHz1.03 V3D Load875 MHz1225 MHz1.18 V AMD includes their own overclocking utility with Catalyst Control Center.
by techPowerUp! (May, 2012)In terms of gaming resolutions the card can easily handle all games at maximum settings at 1920x1200.
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
Winner |
| |||||||
| Slightly more shading units | 1,600 | vs | 1,344 | 256 more shading units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 29,150 | vs | 14,380 | More than 2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,374 | vs | 2,606 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 31,610 | vs | 20,160 | More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 9,600 | vs | 4,390 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 160 GB/s | More than 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 56.13 | vs | 31.94 | More than 75% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 70 GTexel/s | More than 45% higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 80 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,578 | vs | 1,401 | Around 85% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 170W | vs | 188W | Around 10% lower TDP | |||
| Radeon HD 5870 | vs | GeForce GTX 670 | ||
| 8.8 | 9.7 | GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VS | |
| 670 vs 760 | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 1050 | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 960 | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 750 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 770 | ||
| VS | |
| 670 vs 970 | ||
| VS | |
| 269 € | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| VS | |
| 1080 Ti vs Pro Vega 64 | ||
| VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| VS | |
| 269 € | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| VS | |
| 269 € | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||