Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 9W vs 31W 3.4x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 210 PCI

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 210 PCI

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 475 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs GeForce 210 PCI 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
1.6 GPixel/s
GeForce 210 PCI
1.9 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
3.2 GTexel/s
GeForce 210 PCI
3.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
64 GFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
35.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs
GeForce 210 PCI 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Loveland GT216
Clock speed 400 MHz 475 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 9W 31W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs
GeForce 210 PCI 
Shading units 80 16
Texture mapping units 8 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.6 GPixel/s 1.9 GPixel/s
Texture rate 3.2 GTexel/s 3.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 64 GFLOPS 35.2 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus