Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Report a correction
Lower TDP 9W vs 50W 5.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 400 MHz More than 2.2x higher clock speed
Slightly higher texture rate 30.11 GTexel/s vs 3.2 GTexel/s Around 9.5x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Slightly more shading units 384 vs 80 304 more shading units

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs GeForce GT 750M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
1.6 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 750M
7.53 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
3.2 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 750M
30.11 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6250 IGP
GeForce GT 750M
722.7 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 750M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Loveland GK107
Clock speed 400 MHz 941 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 9W 50W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 750M 
Shading units 80 384
Texture mapping units 8 32
Render output processors 4 16
Pixel rate 1.6 GPixel/s 7.53 GPixel/s
Texture rate 3.2 GTexel/s 30.11 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 64 GFLOPS 722.7 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus