Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6250

Report a correction
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 1,446.5 vs 560 More than 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Slightly more render output processors 4 vs 2 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly lower TDP 19W vs 29W Around 35% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 520

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 520

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 4,380 vs 172 Around 25.5x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 650 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,796 MHz vs 1,000 MHz Around 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 898 MHz vs 500 MHz Around 80% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6250 vs GeForce GT 520

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GT 520

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more


comments powered by Disqus