GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6290 vs 5770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
ATi Radeon HD 5770 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 5770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Radeon HD 5770

ATi Radeon HD 5770

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6290

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6290

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 19W vs 108W 5.7x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 17,844 vs 179 Around 99.8x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 4,800 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 9,992 vs 414 Around 24.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 1,697 vs 136 Around 12.5x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 850 MHz vs 650 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s vs 12.8 GB/s 6x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,360 GFLOPS vs 104 GFLOPS More than 13x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 34 GTexel/s vs 5.2 GTexel/s More than 6.5x higher texture rate
More shading units 800 vs 80 720 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 13.6 GPixel/s vs 2.6 GPixel/s Around 5.2x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 800 MHz 50% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 40 vs 8 32 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More compute units 10 vs 2 8 more compute units
Better manhattan score 3,507.76 vs 591.83 Around 6x better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 805 vs 43 Around 18.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6290 vs 5770

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 5770
3,507.76

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus