0 Comments
| Radeon HD 6290 vs 6250 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,600 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6250 vs the 6290. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6290 vs 6250
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon HD 6290
136
Radeon HD 6250
118
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Radeon HD 6290
1,513
Radeon HD 6250
1,446.5
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Radeon HD 6290
414
Radeon HD 6250
346
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon HD 6290
179
Radeon HD 6250
172
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon HD 6290
963.66
Radeon HD 6250
975.21
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon HD 6290
591.83
Radeon HD 6250
603.85
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing
Radeon HD 6290
3,270
Radeon HD 6250
3,657