0 Comments
| Radeon HD 6350M vs GeForce GTS 250 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly lower TDP | 7W | vs | 150W | 21.4x lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 750 MHz | vs | 500 MHz | 50% higher clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | vs | 12.8 GB/s | Around 5.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 2,300 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | Around 45% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher texture rate | 48 GTexel/s | vs | 4 GTexel/s | 12x higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 8 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher pixel rate | 12 GPixel/s | vs | 2 GPixel/s | 6x higher pixel rate | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 4 | 12 more render output processors | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,150 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 45% higher memory clock speed | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus |
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6350M vs GeForce GTS 250
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon HD 6350M
12.8 GB/s
GeForce GTS 250
73.6 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon HD 6350M
2 GPixel/s
GeForce GTS 250
12 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon HD 6350M
4 GTexel/s
GeForce GTS 250
48 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon HD 6350M
80 GFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
483.8 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce GTS 250
128
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 6350M | vs | GeForce GTS 250 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
GPU name | Robson | G92 B1 | |
Market | Laptop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 500 MHz | 750 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 702 MHz 1 GB | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 80 | 128 | |
Texture mapping units | 8 | 64 | |
Render output processors | 4 | 16 | |
Pixel rate | 2 GPixel/s | 12 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 4 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 80 GFLOPS | 483.8 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon HD 6350M | vs | GeForce GTS 250 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,150 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,600 MHz | 2,300 MHz | |
Memory bus | 64 bit | 256 bit | |
Memory | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 | |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 73.6 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 7W | 150W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GTS 250 vs 8800 GS | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$98 | ||
GTS 250 vs 730 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
GTS 250 vs 630 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GTS 250 vs 9800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GTS 250 vs 9600 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GTS 250 vs 550 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GTS 250 vs 650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||