GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6400 vs 920M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 6400 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 6400  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6400

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6400

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 18W vs 33W More than 45% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Slightly higher texture rate 30.53 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel/s More than 6x higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Better manhattan score 3,685.69 vs 803.03 More than 4.5x better manhattan score
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6400 vs GeForce 920M

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6400
1,483.8
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920M
3,685.69

Comments

comments powered by Disqus