GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6470M vs 920M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce 920M

Nvidia GeForce 920M

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6470M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6470M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M vs the Nvidia GeForce 920M.

Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 1,699.39 Around 2x better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 700 MHz More than 35% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,003.5 vs 4,502 Around 2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better PassMark score 711 vs 313 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 5,032.5 vs 1,461.5 Around 3.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 1,731 vs 535 Around 3.2x better 3DMark06 score
Higher texture rate 30.53 GTexel/s vs 5.6 GTexel/s Around 5.5x higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 732.7 GFLOPS vs 224 GFLOPS More than 3.2x better floating-point performance
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
More shading units 384 vs 160 224 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 648 vs 194 More than 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Better face detection score 8.36 mPixels/s vs 2.31 mPixels/s More than 3.5x better face detection score
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6470M vs GeForce 920M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
23.02 mHash/s
GeForce 920M
40.41 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
2.31 mPixels/s
GeForce 920M
8.36 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
106.88 frames/s
GeForce 920M
157.17 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
41.05 mInteraction/s
GeForce 920M
161.39 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
0.28 frames/s
GeForce 920M
0.84 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
5.56 frames/s
GeForce 920M
15.36 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
1,699.39
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6470M
1,188.37
GeForce 920M
3,685.69

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus