Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6520G IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6520G IGP

Report a correction
Slightly more shading units 320 vs 80 240 more shading units
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 8 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly more compute units 4 vs 2 Twice as many compute units
Front view of Radeon HD 6250

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6250

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6520G IGP  vs 6250 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6520G IGP
3.2 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 6250
2.6 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6520G IGP
6.4 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 6250
5.2 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6520G IGP
Radeon HD 6250

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6520G IGP  vs
GPU name BeaverCreek Cedar PRO
Clock speed 400 MHz 650 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 35W 19W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6520G IGP  vs
Shading units 320 80
Texture mapping units 16 8
Render output processors 8 4
Compute units 4 2
Pixel rate 3.2 GPixel/s 2.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 6.4 GTexel/s 5.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 256 GFLOPS 104 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus