Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6530D IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6530D IGP

Report a correction
Slightly more shading units 320 vs 96 224 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GT 240

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 240

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 550 MHz vs 443 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs GeForce GT 240 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
3.54 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 240
4.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
7.09 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 240
17.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
283.5 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
257.3 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs
GeForce GT 240 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name BeaverCreek GT215
Clock speed 443 MHz 550 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 65W 69W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs
GeForce GT 240 
Shading units 320 96
Texture mapping units 16 32
Render output processors 8 8
Pixel rate 3.54 GPixel/s 4.4 GPixel/s
Texture rate 7.09 GTexel/s 17.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 283.5 GFLOPS 257.3 GFLOPS

Read more


comments powered by Disqus