Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6530D IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6530D IGP

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly more shading units 320 vs 160 Twice as many shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 16 vs 8 Twice as many texture mapping units
Slightly more compute units 4 vs 2 Twice as many compute units
Front view of Radeon HD 6400

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6400

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 625 MHz vs 443 MHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 18W vs 65W 3.6x lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs 6400 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
3.54 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 6400
2.5 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
7.09 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 6400
5 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6530D IGP
283.5 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 6400

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs
GPU name BeaverCreek Caicos LE
Clock speed 443 MHz 625 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 65W 18W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6530D IGP  vs
Shading units 320 160
Texture mapping units 16 8
Render output processors 8 4
Compute units 4 2
Pixel rate 3.54 GPixel/s 2.5 GPixel/s
Texture rate 7.09 GTexel/s 5 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 283.5 GFLOPS 200 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus