Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6550D IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6550D IGP

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 600 MHz vs 475 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
More shading units 400 vs 16 384 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 210

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 210

Report a correction
Lower TDP 31W vs 65W 2.1x lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6550D IGP  vs GeForce 210 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6550D IGP
4.8 GPixel/s
GeForce 210
1.9 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6550D IGP
12 GTexel/s
GeForce 210
3.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6550D IGP
GeForce 210

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6550D IGP  vs
GeForce 210 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name BeaverCreek GT216
Clock speed 600 MHz 475 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB

noise and power

TDP 65W 31W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6550D IGP  vs
GeForce 210 
Shading units 400 16
Texture mapping units 20 8
Render output processors 8 4
Pixel rate 4.8 GPixel/s 1.9 GPixel/s
Texture rate 12 GTexel/s 3.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 480 GFLOPS 35.2 GFLOPS

Read more


comments powered by Disqus