Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6620G IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6620G IGP

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 8 vs 4 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly more shading units 400 vs 240 160 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 20 vs 12 8 more texture mapping units
Slightly more compute units 5 vs 3 2 more compute units
Front view of Radeon HD 6480G IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6480G IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6480G IGP vs the 6620G IGP.

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6620G IGP  vs 6480G IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 6620G IGP
3.55 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 6480G IGP
1.78 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 6620G IGP
8.88 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 6480G IGP
5.33 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 6620G IGP
355.2 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 6480G IGP
213.1 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 6620G IGP  vs
6480G IGP 
GPU name BeaverCreek BeaverCreek
Clock speed 444 MHz 444 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 35W 35W

raw performance

Radeon HD 6620G IGP  vs
6480G IGP 
Shading units 400 240
Texture mapping units 20 12
Render output processors 8 4
Compute units 5 3
Pixel rate 3.55 GPixel/s 1.78 GPixel/s
Texture rate 8.88 GTexel/s 5.33 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 355.2 GFLOPS 213.1 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus