GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6670 vs 610 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.3

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 6670 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 6670  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6670

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6670

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 9,160 vs 3,910 More than 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 1,200 MHz More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 7,020 vs 1,820 More than 3.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better T-Rex score 3,356.74 vs 1,767.61 Around 90% better T-Rex score
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 9.6 GB/s Around 6.8x higher memory bandwidth
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 23,093 vs 8,914 More than 2.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 1,990 vs 560 More than 3.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate 45 vs 27 More than 65% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Slightly better floating-point performance 768 GFLOPS vs 155.52 GFLOPS Around 5x better floating-point performance
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 600 MHz More than 65% higher memory clock speed
Better sky diver factor score 89.24 vs 33.48 Around 2.8x better sky diver factor score
More shading units 480 vs 48 432 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 24 vs 8 Three times as many texture mapping units
Slightly better video composition score 16.08 frames/s vs 6.02 frames/s Around 2.8x better video composition score
Front view of GeForce GT 610

Reasons to consider the
ASUS GeForce GT 610

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 29W vs 66W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6670 vs GeForce GT 610

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6670
38.55 mHash/s
GeForce GT 610
10.05 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6670
4.86 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 610
2.45 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6670
292.82 frames/s
GeForce GT 610
79.74 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6670
3,356.74
GeForce GT 610
1,767.61

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6670
3,268.05
GeForce GT 610
1,169.45

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus