Winner
AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 6670 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon HD 6670 vs 5450 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6670 vs 5450 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | 5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 9,160 | vs | 2,930 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 6.4 GB/s | 10x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 7,020 | vs | 890 | Around 8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,052 | vs | 231 | More than 4.5x better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 1,990 | vs | 330 | More than 6x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 768 GFLOPS | vs | 104 GFLOPS | Around 7.5x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 88.99 | vs | 19.5 | More than 4.5x better sky diver factor score | |||
| More shading units | 480 | vs | 80 | 400 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 24 | vs | 8 | Three times as many texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly more compute units | 6 | vs | 2 | Three times as many compute units | |||
| Slightly better manhattan score | 2,774.23 | vs | 1,107.21 | More than 2.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 512 | vs | 83 | Around 6.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 19W | vs | 66W | 3.5x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
