GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6670 vs 5850

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

Civilization 5

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2012) and 2 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Power Consumption and Load Power Consumption

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
ATi Radeon HD 5850 

GPUBoss recommends the ATi Radeon HD 5850  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Radeon HD 5850

ATi Radeon HD 5850

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6670

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6670

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 800 MHz vs 725 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
More energy-efficient load power consumption 220W vs 303W More than 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
More energy-efficient idle power consumption 106W vs 117W Around 10% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Lower TDP 66W vs 151W 2.3x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 5850

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5850

Report a correction
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 48.23 vs 17.8 Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better passmark score 2,276 vs 1,047 Around 2.2x better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 14,028 vs 7,020 Around 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 15,598 vs 9,160 More than 70% better 3DMark06 score
Better floating-point performance 2,088 GFLOPS vs 768 GFLOPS Around 2.8x better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 128 GB/s vs 64 GB/s 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher pixel rate 23.2 GPixel/s vs 6.4 GPixel/s More than 3.5x higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 52.2 GTexel/s vs 19.2 GTexel/s Around 2.8x higher texture rate
More shading units 1,440 vs 480 Three times as many shading units
More texture mapping units 72 vs 24 Three times as many texture mapping units
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score 132 vs 66.6 Around 2x better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score
More compute units 18 vs 6 Three times as many compute units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 79,107 vs 23,093 Around 3.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score 9,600 vs 4,500 Around 2.2x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score
Better passmark direct compute score 1,125 vs 498 More than 2.2x better passmark direct compute score
Higher civilization 5 framerate 39.9 fps vs 26.4 fps More than 50% higher civilization 5 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6670 vs 5850

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

Radeon HD 6670 Radeon HD 5850 @ anandtech.com

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering

Radeon HD 6670 Radeon HD 5850 @ anandtech.com

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 6670  vs 5850 

8.3
9.4
The HIS iCooler V heasink is an elaborate piece of cooling technology.
Radeon HD 5850

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus