Radeon HD 6750 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 4,600 MHz | vs | 2,484 MHz | More than 85% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More shading units | 720 | vs | 240 | Three times as many shading units | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 86W | vs | 204W | 2.4x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 159 GB/s | vs | 73.6 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 128 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 36 | 44 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher texture rate | 51.84 GTexel/s | vs | 25.2 GTexel/s | More than 2x higher texture rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 20.74 GPixel/s | vs | 11.2 GPixel/s | More than 85% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,242 MHz | vs | 1,150 MHz | Around 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 6750 vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 6750 | vs | GeForce GTX 285 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Juniper PRO | GT200 B3 | |
| Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clock speed | 700 MHz | 648 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 720 | 240 | |
| Texture mapping units | 36 | 80 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 32 | |
| Pixel rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | 20.74 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 51.84 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,008 GFLOPS | 708.5 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon HD 6750 | vs | GeForce GTX 285 Mac |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,150 MHz | 1,242 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 4,600 MHz | 2,484 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 512 bit | |
| Memory | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 73.6 GB/s | 159 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 86W | 204W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
