GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6750 vs 480


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load


GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

EVGA GeForce GTX 480 

GPUBoss recommends the EVGA GeForce GTX 480  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

EVGA GeForce GTX 480

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6750

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 3,800 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 86W vs 250W 2.9x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 480

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 23,824 vs 12,270 Around 95% better 3DMark06 score
Much better manhattan score 5,404.81 vs 3,378.37 Around 60% better manhattan score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,100 vs 8,290 Around 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 4,336 vs 1,299 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s vs 73.6 GB/s Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Much better cloud gate factor score 19.54 vs 10.36 Around 90% better cloud gate factor score
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,014 vs 2,040 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better T-Rex score 4,992.9 vs 3,358.1 Around 50% better T-Rex score
Significantly better sky diver factor score 246.63 vs 96.07 More than 2.5x better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 48 vs 16 Three times as many render output processors
Better fire strike factor score 36.58 vs 11.39 Around 3.2x better fire strike factor score
Higher pixel rate 21.8 GPixel/s vs 11.2 GPixel/s Around 95% higher pixel rate
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 136,323 vs 29,589 More than 4.5x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Slightly higher texture rate 43.6 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s Around 75% higher texture rate
Slightly more texture mapping units 60 vs 36 24 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,544 vs 629 Around 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 128 bit 3x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6750 vs GeForce GTX 480

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
86.54 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 480
98.53 mHash/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
GeForce GTX 480

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


comments powered by Disqus