GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6750 vs 480 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

EVGA GeForce GTX 480 

GPUBoss recommends the EVGA GeForce GTX 480  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

EVGA GeForce GTX 480

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6750

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,600 MHz vs 3,800 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Much lower TDP 86W vs 250W 2.9x lower TDP
Slightly more shading units 720 vs 480 240 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,150 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 480

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 23,824 vs 12,270 Around 95% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 4,356 vs 1,298 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s vs 73.6 GB/s Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,100 vs 8,290 Around 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher pixel rate 43.5 GPixel/s vs 11.2 GPixel/s Around 4x higher pixel rate
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,014 vs 2,040 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher texture rate 87.1 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel/s Around 3.5x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 48 vs 16 Three times as many render output processors
Better fire strike factor score 31.06 vs 9.66 Around 3.2x better fire strike factor score
Better T-Rex score 4,992.9 vs 3,359.14 Around 50% better T-Rex score
More texture mapping units 60 vs 36 24 more texture mapping units
Slightly better particle simulation score 301.6 mInteraction/s vs 175.78 mInteraction/s More than 70% better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,561 vs 647 Around 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 128 bit 3x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6750 vs GeForce GTX 480

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
90.41 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 480
116.96 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
8.04 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 480
28.78 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
529.47 frames/s
GeForce GTX 480
1,211.75 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
GeForce GTX 480

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6750
GeForce GTX 480

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


comments powered by Disqus