GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6870 vs 660M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

Dead Space 3, Diablo III and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
MSI Radeon HD 6870 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI Radeon HD 6870  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

MSI Radeon HD 6870

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 6870

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6870

Reasons to consider the
MSI Radeon HD 6870

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,860 vs 2,369 More than 10x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 930 MHz vs 835 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,716.03 vs 1,849.63 More than 2x better manhattan score
Higher memory bandwidth 134.4 GB/s vs 64 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 16,393 vs 9,803 More than 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 2,578 vs 1,407 Around 85% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 2,083 GFLOPS vs 641.3 GFLOPS Around 3.2x better floating-point performance
Higher pixel rate 29.8 GPixel/s vs 6.68 GPixel/s Around 4.5x higher pixel rate
Higher texture rate 52.1 GTexel/s vs 26.7 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
Better T-Rex score 3,358.1 vs 2,513.15 Around 35% better T-Rex score
More shading units 1,120 vs 384 736 more shading units
Significantly higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 90 fps vs 50.3 fps Around 80% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher dead space 3 framerate 85 fps vs 49.5 fps More than 70% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 127 fps vs 67 fps Around 90% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly more texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 660M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 14,704 vs 4,218 Around 3.5x better 3DMark06 score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Lower TDP 50W vs 151W 3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6870 vs GeForce GTX 660M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

Radeon HD 6870
3,358.1
GeForce GTX 660M
2,513.15

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

Radeon HD 6870
3,716.03
GeForce GTX 660M
1,849.63

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus