GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 6970M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 6970M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6970M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 17,447 vs 4,021 More than 4.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 64.1 GB/s Around 80% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher pixel rate 21.76 GPixel/s vs 12.75 GPixel/s More than 70% higher pixel rate
Better bitcoin mining score 117.8 mHash/s vs 43.54 mHash/s Around 2.8x better bitcoin mining score
Slightly more shading units 960 vs 768 192 more shading units
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 2,818.5 Around 7x better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 680 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Much higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 64.6 fps Around 75% higher diablo III framerate
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 11,499 More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s More than 55% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 48 16 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 6970M vs GeForce GTX 765M

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
117.8 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
10.57 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
785.77 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
520.75 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
180.17 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 765M
101.59 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
0.93 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
0.93 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 6970M
24.46 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
19.95 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus