Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7520G IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 7520G IGP

Report a correction
Lower TDP 35W vs 95W 2.7x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 9600

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 9600

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 650 MHz vs 496 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Slightly higher pixel rate 10.4 GPixel/s vs 1.98 GPixel/s More than 5.2x higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 32 vs 12 20 more texture mapping units

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 7520G IGP  vs GeForce GT 9600 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 7520G IGP
1.98 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 9600
10.4 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 7520G IGP
5.95 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 9600
20.8 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 7520G IGP
190.5 GFLOPS
GeForce GT 9600
208 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

Radeon HD 7520G IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9600 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Scrapper G94
Clock speed 496 MHz 650 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 35W 95W

raw performance

Radeon HD 7520G IGP  vs
GeForce GT 9600 
Shading units 192 64
Texture mapping units 12 32
Render output processors 4 16
Pixel rate 1.98 GPixel/s 10.4 GPixel/s
Texture rate 5.95 GTexel/s 20.8 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 190.5 GFLOPS 208 GFLOPS

Comments

comments powered by Disqus