Winner
IGP Radeon HD 7560D IGP
GPUBoss recommends the IGP Radeon HD 7560D IGP based on its .
See full details Radeon HD 7560D IGP vs GeForce GTX 460 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7560D IGP vs 460 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.5 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 760 MHz | vs | 675 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower TDP | 65W | vs | 160W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| More texture mapping units | 56 | vs | 16 | 40 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 37.8 GTexel/s | vs | 12.2 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 7560D IGP vs GeForce GTX 460
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 7560D IGP | vs | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Devastator | GF104 | |
| Clock speed | 760 MHz | 675 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 65W | 160W | |
raw performance | Radeon HD 7560D IGP | vs | GeForce GTX 460 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 256 | 336 | |
| Texture mapping units | 16 | 56 | |
| Render output processors | 8 | 32 | |
| Pixel rate | 6.08 GPixel/s | 9.45 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 12.2 GTexel/s | 37.8 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 389.1 GFLOPS | 907.2 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
