GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7610M vs 460 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

ASUS Radeon HD 7610M 

GPUBoss recommends the ASUS Radeon HD 7610M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7610M

Reasons to consider the
ASUS Radeon HD 7610M

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 20W vs 160W 8x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 460

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 675 MHz vs 500 MHz 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,600 MHz vs 1,600 MHz 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 32 vs 8 24 more render output processors
Significantly better sky diver factor score 184.27 vs 69.21 Around 2.8x better sky diver factor score
Higher texture rate 37.8 GTexel/s vs 10 GTexel/s More than 3.8x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 20 36 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7610M vs GeForce GTX 460

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more


comments powered by Disqus