GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7650A vs 765M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.5

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7650A

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7650A

Report a correction
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Significantly better PassMark score 1,874 vs 797 More than 2.2x better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,711.62 vs 945.04 Around 4x better manhattan score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel/s More than 3.5x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,224.2 GFLOPS vs 576 GFLOPS Around 2.2x better floating-point performance
More texture mapping units 64 vs 24 40 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.75 GPixel/s vs 4.8 GPixel/s Around 2.8x higher pixel rate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,273 vs 430 Around 3x better PassMark direct compute score
Better ocean surface simulation score 520.75 frames/s vs 259.83 frames/s More than 2x better ocean surface simulation score
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 768 vs 480 288 more shading units
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7650A vs GeForce GTX 765M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
53.84 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
4.43 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
259.83 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
520.75 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
90.53 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 765M
101.59 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
0.43 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
0.93 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
13.3 frames/s
GeForce GTX 765M
19.95 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7650A
1,342.64
GeForce GTX 765M
3,343.45

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus