Radeon HD 7650M Rebrand vs GeForce GTX 760M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 760MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,333 | vs | 3,395 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower TDP | 20W | vs | 55W | 2.7x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,221 | vs | 945.5 | More than 20.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 12,477 | vs | 3,886 | Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 1,394 | vs | 725 | More than 90% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 628 MHz | vs | 485 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 1,600 MHz | More than 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64.1 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher texture rate | 40.2 GTexel/s | vs | 11.64 GTexel/s | Around 3.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 24 | 40 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 964.6 GFLOPS | vs | 465.6 GFLOPS | More than 2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 10.05 GPixel/s | vs | 3.88 GPixel/s | More than 2.5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,020 | vs | 302 | Around 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 480 | 288 more shading units | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 149.01 | vs | 65.2 | More than 2.2x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
