GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7670 vs 5770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.9

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7670 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7670  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7670

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7670

Report a correction
Lower TDP 66W vs 108W Around 40% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 5770

Reasons to consider the
ATi Radeon HD 5770

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,800 MHz vs 4,000 MHz 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,360 GFLOPS vs 768 GFLOPS More than 75% better floating-point performance
Better sky diver factor score 140.24 vs 89.13 More than 55% better sky diver factor score
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
More shading units 800 vs 480 320 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,200 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 20% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7670 vs 5770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670
71.83 mHash/s
Radeon HD 5770
72.64 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670
7.27 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 5770
9.98 mPixels/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670
0.46 frames/s
Radeon HD 5770
1.05 frames/s

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus