GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7670M vs 960M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7670M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7670M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 20W vs 75W 3.7x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 85% higher clock speed
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 8,203 Around 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better PassMark score 2,043 vs 814 More than 2.5x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 5,277 vs 1,061.5 Around 5x better 3DMark06 score
Much better manhattan score 3,713.7 vs 1,737.63 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 3,600 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 576 GFLOPS Around 2.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score 795.24 frames/s vs 210.9 frames/s More than 3.8x better ocean surface simulation score
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 14.4 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 57.6 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 1,479 vs 360 More than 4x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 9.6 GPixel/s Around 85% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 32.14 vs 8.03 More than 4x better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 40 vs 24 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7670M vs GeForce GTX 960M

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670M
2.47 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670M
210.9 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670M
84.18 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7670M
1,803.68
GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus