GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7730M vs 960M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7730M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7730M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 9,615 vs 5,277 More than 80% better 3DMark06 score
Lower TDP 25W vs 75W 3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 1,478 More than 16x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 575 MHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Significantly better PassMark score 2,043 vs 1,010 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 27 fps Around 4.5x higher diablo III framerate
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 675 MHz Around 75% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 28.8 GB/s More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 691.2 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Better bitcoin mining score 174.57 mHash/s vs 69.76 mHash/s More than 2.5x better bitcoin mining score
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 21.6 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 10.8 GPixel/s Around 65% higher pixel rate
Better fire strike factor score 32.14 vs 14.28 More than 2.2x better fire strike factor score
Slightly better manhattan score 3,713.7 vs 3,517.84 More than 5% better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7730M vs GeForce GTX 960M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7730M
69.76 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7730M
15.24 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7730M
289.17 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7730M
3,365.76
GeForce GTX 960M
3,353.98

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Comments

comments powered by Disqus