GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7750 vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

GeForce GTX 660 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the GeForce GTX 660 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7750

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7750

Report a correction
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 52.5 vs 46.4 Around 15% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Significantly lower TDP 55W vs 150W 2.7x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,997 vs 12,730 More than 80% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better PassMark score 4,686 vs 1,682 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 27,687 vs 11,070 More than 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 96.9 fps vs 26.9 fps More than 3.5x higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 8,415 vs 3,240 More than 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 144.2 GB/s vs 72 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 4,500 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,459.5 GFLOPS vs 819.2 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 25.6 GTexel/s More than 4x higher texture rate
Higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 32 80 more texture mapping units
Much better cloud gate factor score 20.13 vs 13.74 More than 45% better cloud gate factor score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 1,344 vs 512 832 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 25.62 GPixel/s vs 12.8 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,125 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,546 vs 1,019 Around 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Better manhattan score 3,711.8 vs 430.32 Around 8.8x better manhattan score
Better T-Rex score 3.04 frames/s vs 2.18 frames/s Around 40% better T-Rex score
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7750 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7750
98.19 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
102.46 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7750
21.75 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
35.9 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Read more


comments powered by Disqus