0 Comments
| Radeon HD 7750 vs 3850 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 4,500 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 5.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | vs | 25.6 GB/s | More than 2.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 669 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,125 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 2.8x higher memory clock speed | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 25.6 GTexel/s | vs | 10.7 GTexel/s | Around 2.5x higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Slightly more shading units | 512 | vs | 320 | 192 more shading units | |||
Slightly more compute units | 8 | vs | 4 | Twice as many compute units | |||
Slightly lower TDP | 55W | vs | 75W | More than 25% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus |
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 7750 vs 3850
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
Radeon HD 7750
72 GB/s
Radeon HD 3850
25.6 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon HD 7750
12.8 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 3850
10.7 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon HD 7750
25.6 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 3850
10.7 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon HD 7750
819.2 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850
428.16 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon HD 7750
512
Radeon HD 3850
320
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Reviews Word on the street
Radeon HD 7750 | vs | 3850 | ||
![]() | 8.4 | 9.0 |
---|
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 7750 | vs | 3850 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | ATI | |
GPU name | Cape Verde PRO | RV670 PRO | |
Market | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 669 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | ATi Radeon HD 3850 668 MHz 512 MB | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 512 | 320 | |
Texture mapping units | 32 | 16 | |
Render output processors | 16 | 16 | |
Compute units | 8 | 4 | |
Pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | 10.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 25.6 GTexel/s | 10.7 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 819.2 GFLOPS | 428.16 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon HD 7750 | vs | 3850 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 1,125 MHz | 400 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 4,500 MHz | 800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 128 bit | 256 bit | |
Memory | 1,024 MB | 512 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 55W | 75W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||