Radeon HD 7750 vs 6670 |
Released February, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7750
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
6.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Nov, 2012)The game's graphics are, even for today, top notch, yet the game will still run well on most computers.
VS
Released April, 2011
AMD Radeon HD 6670
- 800 MHz
- 1 GB GDDR5
5.9 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2011)Perhaps targeting that segment while maintaining some feature-set cushion with "100% DirectX 11 compliance," AMD is releasing its new Radeon HD 6670 graphics card.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7750 vs 6670
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| Civilization 5 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2012) and 2 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption and Load Power Consumption | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly better passmark score | 1,634 | vs | 1,045 | More than 55% better passmark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 10,820 | vs | 6,960 | More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 12,640 | vs | 9,350 | More than 35% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Slightly higher effective memory clock speed | 4,500 MHz | vs | 4,000 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | vs | 6.4 GPixel/s | 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 87,085 | vs | 23,093 | More than 3.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score | 104.3 | vs | 66.6 | More than 55% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score | |||
| Slightly more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 104W | vs | 106W | Almost the same | |||
| Higher civilization 5 framerate | 41.7 fps | vs | 26.4 fps | Around 60% higher civilization 5 framerate | |||
| Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | 7,300 | vs | 4,500 | More than 60% better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,125 MHz | vs | 1,000 MHz | Around 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 947 | vs | 500 | Around 90% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 6670 vs the 7750. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7750 vs 6670
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
Radeon HD 7750 | by BigPapa1975 (May, 2012)I ran Passmark BurnIn Test while watching a Blu-Ray Movie AND recording two HD programs with my Ceton InfiniTV and this thing didn't break a sweat.
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
Radeon HD 7750 | by Nicholas-DolinThis card doesn't dissapoint, my 3dmark03 score went from 27,000ish with the 5670 to a nicer 60,000ish score with the 7750 (at 960/1265, factory is).
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon HD 7750 | vs | 6670 | ||
 | Radeon HD 7750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Radeon HD 6670 | |||
Overall | Out of 10 | Out of 10 | ||
