GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7750M vs 6950 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Sapphire Radeon HD 6950 

GPUBoss recommends the Sapphire Radeon HD 6950  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7750M

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 28W vs 200W 7.1x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 6950

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon HD 6950

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,760 vs 2,085 Around 9.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 880 MHz vs 575 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 3,192 vs 1,191 Around 2.8x better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 166.4 GB/s vs 64 GB/s More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,478 GFLOPS vs 588.8 GFLOPS Around 4.2x better floating-point performance
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,890 vs 15,480 Around 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,240 vs 2,085 More than 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,200 MHz vs 4,000 MHz 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 77.44 GTexel/s vs 18.4 GTexel/s Around 4.2x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 28.16 GPixel/s vs 9.2 GPixel/s More than 3x higher pixel rate
Better sky diver factor score 242.26 vs 138.17 More than 75% better sky diver factor score
More shading units 1,408 vs 512 896 more shading units
More texture mapping units 88 vs 32 56 more texture mapping units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
More compute units 22 vs 8 14 more compute units
Higher memory clock speed 1,300 MHz vs 1,000 MHz 30% higher memory clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,261 vs 725 Around 75% better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7750M vs 6950

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more


comments powered by Disqus