GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7770 vs 560 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7770

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7770

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 19,307 vs 16,518 More than 15% better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 950 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
More energy-efficient load power consumption 242W vs 322W Around 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
More energy-efficient idle power consumption 106W vs 113W More than 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score 9,600 vs 6,800 More than 40% better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score
Lower TDP 80W vs 170W 2.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 3,536 vs 2,166 Around 65% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 134.4 GB/s vs 72 GB/s More than 85% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 17,648 vs 13,398 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Slightly higher texture rate 60.8 GTexel/s vs 40 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 52.5 vs 40 More than 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score 175.6 vs 138.1 More than 25% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2012) score
Slightly more texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 132,987 vs 105,396 More than 25% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Higher batman: arkham city framerate 51 fps vs 36 fps More than 40% higher batman: arkham city framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 57.3 fps vs 41.4 fps Around 40% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 30.4 fps vs 23 fps More than 30% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Higher civilization 5 framerate 66.1 fps vs 55.6 fps Around 20% higher civilization 5 framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7770 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7770
164.28 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
54.73 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7770
33.84 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
28.42 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 3

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 7770  vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 

8.7
9.2
Considering the excellent cooling capabilities of the heatsink I see no reason why they didn't clock higher.
GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Nope
I've got an EVGA GTX 560 Ti 1GB GDR5, running on a MSI Mono and a AMD FX-8120 processor. Should the brand differences interfere in anyway?
comments powered by Disqus