GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7790 vs 560M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7790 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7790  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon HD 7790

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7790

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 19,360 vs 8,003.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better passmark score 3,017 vs 1,547 More than 95% better passmark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,670 vs 1,820 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 1,792 GFLOPS vs 595.2 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 56 GTexel/s vs 24.8 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16 GPixel/s vs 6.2 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
Higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 60 GB/s 60% higher memory bandwidth
More shading units 896 vs 192 704 more shading units
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 127,080 vs 46,652 Around 2.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better passmark direct compute score 1,504 vs 672 Around 2.2x better passmark direct compute score
More texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
More memory 1,536 MB vs 1,024 MB 50% more memory
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7790 vs GeForce GTX 560M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 560M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 560M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Comments

comments powered by Disqus