GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7790 vs 560M among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

AMD Radeon HD 7790 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7790  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

AMD Radeon HD 7790

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7790

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 19,360 vs 8,003.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 3,008 vs 1,554 Around 95% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,670 vs 1,820 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 60 GB/s 60% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,792 GFLOPS vs 595.2 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 56 GTexel/s vs 24.8 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
More shading units 896 vs 192 704 more shading units
Slightly higher pixel rate 16 GPixel/s vs 6.2 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 127,080 vs 46,652 Around 2.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better manhattan score 3,717.87 vs 3,379.02 More than 10% better manhattan score
Better fire strike factor score 36.08 vs 17.37 More than 2x better fire strike factor score
Better particle simulation score 334.12 mInteraction/s vs 103.53 mInteraction/s Around 3.2x better particle simulation score
More texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,530 vs 670 More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7790 vs GeForce GTX 560M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
218.89 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560M
50.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
40.28 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560M
13.61 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
827.47 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560M
402.63 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
GeForce GTX 560M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
GeForce GTX 560M

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark


comments powered by Disqus