GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7790 vs 560M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7790 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7790  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon HD 7790

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7790

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7790

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 775 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,000 MHz vs 2,500 MHz Around 2.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 19,360 vs 8,003.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better PassMark score 2,997 vs 1,555 Around 95% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 5,670 vs 1,820 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 1,792 GFLOPS vs 595.2 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 96 GB/s vs 60 GB/s 60% higher memory bandwidth
Much higher memory clock speed 1,500 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 2.5x higher memory clock speed
Significantly better sky diver factor score 256.79 vs 109.3 More than 2.2x better sky diver factor score
Better cloud gate factor score 16.81 vs 12.5 Around 35% better cloud gate factor score
Higher texture rate 56 GTexel/s vs 24.8 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 16 GPixel/s vs 6.2 GPixel/s More than 2.5x higher pixel rate
More shading units 896 vs 192 704 more shading units
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 127,080 vs 46,652 Around 2.8x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better fire strike factor score 35.46 vs 16.87 More than 2x better fire strike factor score
Better manhattan score 3,717.87 vs 3,247.43 Around 15% better manhattan score
Better particle simulation score 323.17 mInteraction/s vs 103.53 mInteraction/s More than 3x better particle simulation score
Slightly more texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,516 vs 670 More than 2.2x better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 560M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7790 vs GeForce GTX 560M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
217.92 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 560M
50.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
40.11 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 560M
13.65 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
825.27 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560M
402.63 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
323.17 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 560M
103.53 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
3.67 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560M
1.24 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7790
61.57 frames/s
GeForce GTX 560M
24.96 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus